Desmond File

Blog archive

Of Spin and Spam

First there was the Notebooks for Bloggers imbroglio, where Microsoft gifted prominent bloggers with tasty Windows Vista-based laptops. Now the company has been caught in a dust-up with Wikipedia.

The whole thing centers around Microsoft's effort to hire a technical writer to review and edit a pair of Wikipedia entries. One titled "OpenDocument" about the OpenDocument File format standard, and the other titled "ECMA Office Open XML" about Microsoft's competing standard file format. While Wikipedia is famously open to edits and contributions from individuals, the organization is adamantly opposed to any sort of pay-for-play activity on the site.

Microsoft says it explored paying a contributor to review and tweak entries to help counter what it described as inaccuracies in the online content. No money ever changed hands and no for-fee changes were made to the Wikipedia entries. But the contretemps reveal growing fault lines as developer relations and communications become increasingly diverse.

Microsoft, of course, is a leader in this arena. The company has long boasted superior documentation and support for its platforms and APIs -- an effort that has helped it outdistance rivals like Netscape and IBM, among others. More recently, Microsoft has opened a series of alternative channels, including hundreds of Microsoft employee-based blogs, information-heavy video sites like Channel 9 and the creation of MSDN wikis.

But the company seems to struggle with how to manage the wild Web of communications on the greater Internet. For instance, in the case of Wikipedia, Microsoft says it tried to get Wikipedia editors to address the alleged mistakes without success, before turning to the idea of paying someone to edit the content.

What are your thoughts? Did Microsoft cross a line? And should it even be considering these kinds of activities when its internal resources or so vast and capable? E-mail me at mdesmond@reddevnews.com, and we may publish your advice to Microsoft.

Posted by Michael Desmond on 01/24/2007


comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • Compare New GitHub Copilot Free Plan for Visual Studio/VS Code to Paid Plans

    The free plan restricts the number of completions, chat requests and access to AI models, being suitable for occasional users and small projects.

  • Diving Deep into .NET MAUI

    Ever since someone figured out that fiddling bits results in source code, developers have sought one codebase for all types of apps on all platforms, with Microsoft's latest attempt to further that effort being .NET MAUI.

  • Copilot AI Boosts Abound in New VS Code v1.96

    Microsoft improved on its new "Copilot Edit" functionality in the latest release of Visual Studio Code, v1.96, its open-source based code editor that has become the most popular in the world according to many surveys.

  • AdaBoost Regression Using C#

    Dr. James McCaffrey from Microsoft Research presents a complete end-to-end demonstration of the AdaBoost.R2 algorithm for regression problems (where the goal is to predict a single numeric value). The implementation follows the original source research paper closely, so you can use it as a guide for customization for specific scenarios.

  • Versioning and Documenting ASP.NET Core Services

    Building an API with ASP.NET Core is only half the job. If your API is going to live more than one release cycle, you're going to need to version it. If you have other people building clients for it, you're going to need to document it.

Subscribe on YouTube